A Plea for More Pessimism ..............

 

As a pessimist I have always felt very comfortable in the world of emergency management.  I find it a useful starting point.  I am all for looking for the positive but not at the expense of ignoring the negative.

Against this background I was left worried by a series of conversations last week (did I say that I also don’t like Christmas? - I am sure that a picture is developing of what it must be like to work with me) I was talking to practitioners about the new National Risk Register (1) and the use of Reasonable Worst Case (RWC) methodology.  Inevitably we moved on to talking about the response to the pandemic.  Overall I got the impression that there is a common view that Covid-19 represents the very high point of challenge and that ‘if we can deal with this we can deal with anything’.  On the basis of any risk assessment we could be called to face things that are on an even greater scale.  We have seen over 80,000 deaths in the UK spread out over 10 months.  In the case of a new flu this could be many times bigger and we have a long way to go before Covid-19 becomes a matter for historians.  Of course there are a whole range of other incidents (a large scale CBRN incident for example) that would create massive challenges, and we can be called upon to face one than one thing at a time (flooding anybody?).  During 2020 the efforts of front line, back room and scientific workers has been first class.  I am not so sure about the structure that they work in or the capacity of the system to prepare for what might come next.   Optimism is a luxury for the general public and blind optimism is a tool for politicians.

The 9/11 Commission summed it up in words that should be on the wall of every Emergency Planner and Strategic Commander:  “Emergency response is a product of preparedness” (2)

A few years ago I did some work on the creation of volunteer reserves for public services.  It did not get very far.  The idea behind it was that it is much easier to use volunteers in crises if they have been selected, vetted and trained in advance.  These processes are remarkably cheap and the existence of a reserve provides an insurance policy for sudden and long lasting surges in demand.  At the start of the pandemic several organisations, including police forces, started to cast around for volunteers.  Very few were actually used and many volunteers did not receive a response to their offer of help.   One might have thought that the lull during the Summer would have seen the better establishment of volunteer reserves but this seems to have been the exception rather than the rule and many hastily put together projects were abandoned as being ‘not needed’.   We do not know what the future might hold and the future is never far away.

The House of Lords is to hold a Select Committee Inquiry into Risk Assessment and Risk Planning (3)  I do not feel qualified to provide evidence but hopefully the contributions by the Institute of Civil Protection and  Emergency Management (4) and the Emergency Planning Society (5) will inform Peers of the strengths and weaknesses of current practice.  In the context of this blog I would just mention that I have seen many risk assessments that function as an excuse not to take action or spend money when everybody knows that is exactly what needs to be done.  My hint is always to look at the selection and framing of the risk and the suggested mitigation.  I have also seen some pretty good risk assessments that have informed the planning process.  Risk assessments can say what you want them to but the only way of looking at them is to assume that you are looking backwards from the point of a post incident inquiry.

I would urge those commentators that see spare capacity and stockpiles as wasteful to read the recent interviews with front line NHS staff. 

In the world of civil protection a healthy dose of pessimism never goes amiss – and nor does a bit of horizon scanning backed up by good risk assessments with the development of capability that will make a difference when the time comes. 

Of course there have been many positives to come out of this and other crises – and many examples of incredible effort and spectacular innovation.  We should allow ourselves to be briefly heartened and to express our gratitude.  Then we must turn back to face the gloom that is emergency planning/management

Have a happy new year, but be careful, I said this last year!

 

Philip Trendall

 

This is an edited version of a blog prepared for Scott Trendall Ltd

 

 

Philip Trendall QPM

Scott Trendall Ltd

philip@scott-trendall.co.uk

 

Notes

1.       https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/945732/National_Risk_Register.pdf

 

2.       https://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf          p278

 

3.       https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/483/risk-assessment-and-risk-planning-committee/news/138119/how-do-we-ensure-the-uk-is-resilient-to-extreme-risks-and-emergencies/

 

4.       https://www.theicpem.net/

 

5.       https://www.the-eps.org/            

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Being a personal reflection on the importance of anniversaries

Annual Easter Rant

Retired Staff in Crisis - A Follow Up