Does Anybody Know What's Going On?

 

 
 Lockdown Protest in London:  Photo Metro newspaper


The polymath Thomas YOUNG (1773-1829) has been described as the ‘last man to know everything’.  The message being that after his time there was too much knowledge for one person to hold in their brain.  While reading about him my thoughts wandered to the current pandemic and the UK response.  Until a couple of months ago I thought that I was up to date with government guidance and with the Regulations made under various pieces of legislation (I was kidding myself of course).  Now I doubt that anybody has a grip on what the rules, regulations, guidance and advice are on this subject. There is just too much.

A quick search on Legislation.gov.uk returns over 450 pieces of legislation.  Much of this is of a highly technical nature but even the ‘mainstream’ legislation runs to scores of items.  This is legislation, guidance and advice is another matter.  The helpful weekly summary produced by the Institute of Civil Protection and Emergency Management (ICPEM) now runs to 15 A4 pages.  On top of this pile of well meaning documents are the daily press releases from government that seem intent on putting the best possible interpretation of every twist and turn in this difficult situation.  This unbridled optimism makes cynics like me uncomfortable – even though I recognise the benefits of a positive approach. I accept that this is in part a personal flaw rather than an indicator of any attempt to deceive.

An ordinary citizen cannot be expected to be aware of anything other the most general headlines.  The problem is such headlines are transitory.  Guidance, regulation and advice has become a mush that squelches  around social media leaving people with the idea that everything is a matter of interpretation and that all opinions are equally valid.  This situation is a gift to the world of conspiracy theories, misinformation and pure nonsense.

Of course it is not just the volume of information that is the problem;  it is also how it is framed and explained.  Alas, some of it is beyond explanation.  In saying this I am thinking particularly of the ridiculous position we are in regarding the different regulations regarding international travel and self isolation.  The delegation of ‘Health’ to the nations of the UK (except of course there is no delegation to England) was never intended to create the position we find ourselves in, with different regulations covering each part of the UK.  Health is largely a domestic matter but this is not so when there is a pandemic.  Viruses do not respect the accidental borders of the UK.  The idea that two people getting off the same aeroplane have to behave differently if they are domiciled, or are visiting, different sides of these invisible borders is a nonsense.  Even leaving aside the issue of non enforcement, it creates a situation where the public hold the law in contempt.  This is rarely a good thing and is a sure recipe for a decline in public confidence.  This is not a discussion about sovereignty.  If England, Wales and Scotland were independent of each other it would still make sense for there to be a unified response within the same island.   The health of the union, or at least of the people in it, requires that these matters should be subjected to the overall duty of the UK Government to manage international relations.  

As the lessons from the management of the pandemic are assessed there will much to be learned about how regulation, advice and guidance are prepared and communicated. Emergency legislation and communicating with public are areas that must be blessed with proper emergency planning, carried out with the support of emergency planning professionals.  It’s not an easy thing to do, but who said governing was easy?

Philip Trendall

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Being a personal reflection on the importance of anniversaries

Annual Easter Rant

Retired Staff in Crisis - A Follow Up