A Little Bit More Clarity - REAL Clarity Please


It is obvious to everybody - apart from politicians - that clarity of guidance and precision of language is vital. I have just seen the Secretary of State for Transport being interviewed on BBC Breakfast. I do wish I hadn't. Not impressive.
He repeatably said things like 'to remove ambiguity' 'to be clear' etc. He obviously has had some media training, But it sounds like he attended only part of it. Having declared the importance of 'being clear' he then went on to create considerable ambiguity. He should know the difference between guidance and regulations but seemed to use the words interchangeably, See also the attributed comments in the BBC News (link below). In answer to a direct question 'Will it be illegal not wear masks on public transport?' He said 'That's right' and went on to describe it as a 'condition of travel'. Conditions of travel do not create criminal offences. It is right to say that the wearing of face coverings will be compulsory (no face covering = no travel) but criminal sanction can only be found in the emergency health regulations. If they want to use them the Railway Bye-laws (No 12?) - are available (but only for use on the railway of course, how this will be enforced in buses is a mystery) - or they could introduce new or amended regulations/bye-laws -they have had plenty of time to do this. We have seen the consequences of muddled regulation/guidance in the failure of prosecutions and fixed penalties under the 2020 Act and the Health Regulations.

Shapps was better when he described the marginal case for face coverings but was unable to explain why they are waiting to 15th June when, for example, this could be introduced on the London Underground (the infectious cesspit of the Great Wen!) with a day's notice.

For the sake of the public and more especially for those that have to enforce these things pleases can politician be 'really clear' (as they love to say) about what is guidance, what is compulsory (and what makes it so) and what is the law. It will be the staff and police on the ground that have to sort out the muddled thinking of those that purport to be in control.

P.S I am pleased I resisted the temptation to mention the Secretary of State's chosen background for the interview!


This rant is taken from the blog: Civil Protection Miscellany: https://scott-trendall.blogspot.com/




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Being a personal reflection on the importance of anniversaries

Annual Easter Rant

Retired Staff in Crisis - A Follow Up