On the dyeing of lakes and the selling of Easter Eggs...................


The media may be turning on the emergency services.  Slowly the police are becoming the target of criticism for their role in the current crisis.  Today the media is full of comments about the over zealous use of powers by police forces.  The dyeing of lakes, the use of drones and telling shopkeepers not to stock Easter eggs all feature the press today.  Most papers feature the comments by retired Supreme Court Justice Lord Sumption.

Lord Sumption's views are his own and debate such is this is a sign of a healthy democracy and I don't think that people should be criticised for expressing responsible opinions (there is another debate about what is 'responsible' of course). My starting point is to support those who are making really difficult decisions on a daily basis. For policing Sumption makes a key point. Police officers enforce the law, they do not enforce government guidance. The emergency regulations are complicated and very forceful. The police service has had no time to consider them or to put together policy and training.  Why should we be surprised then that the multi police forces of the UK are having a few problems in achieving consistency?  The police service in this country is an amalgam of 45 geographic forces and a handful of specialist forces and national units.  The service has moved quickly on this and are clearly to determined to get it right.

The examples quoted are few and far between.  The use of powers must be kept under scrutiny but I have seen nothing to suggest that we are about to descend into a police state.  I would like to see the appointment of a ‘commissioner’ – a retired senior judge to monitor the use of the powers.  Perhaps this can be done before the six month renewal of the legislation. 
If there is one thing the police service does have to do is self monitor its sense of purpose and identity and how this is articulated by its culture.  This can change over time and is highly influenced by training.  One of the things that marks out British policing from some overseas agencies is its ‘sense’ of independence from government.  The office of constable, the affirmation to the Crown rather than the state (or even the more amorphous ideal of the ‘people’) all create a constitutional identity that offers some protection against tyranny.  The police may be agents of the state but they must not become agents of the executive.  Enforcing the laws created by Parliament but not enforcing the will, whims and decrees of ministers is a vital distinction.  Academics may doubt the very existence of such subtleties, but I would suggest that police leaders cherish them and communicate them to every new officer.

In the meantime I will be more worried about media stories designed to fill the news gap than I am about the common sense of police officers.    

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pandemic: Prosecution Mistakes

Image
A piece in the Guardian has highlighted the fact that 56 people have been incorrectly prosecuted for offences under the emergency regulations and that a further 44 charges (that is ALL of them) under the Coronavirus Act 2020 were wrongly brought.   The article concludes that the errors were a result of the rushed nature of the legislation. Rushed and ill considered legislation rarely works as anybody who has ever tried to use the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 will know.   How can legislation and the regulations that sit under it be drafted, enacted and enforced within a few days without there being any errors?   The introduction of new legislation takes time.   Police officers and prosecutors need training and briefing.   Procedures and bureaucracy needs to be developed (everything from policy to counting codes).   But of course this was an emergency – things had to move quickly.   This is true, but isn’t this what contingency planning is for...
Read more

A Long Reply to a Short Post on Linkedin: JESIP

  This isn’t an article, it isn’t really a blog (although I will post it as such elsewhere).   It is really a comment on a recent helpful post on Linkedin by Rob Davis on the subject of the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP).   Alas my comment is too long winded for the normal format. Before saying anything else I would mention that some posters have suggested that Mr Davis has pre-empted his own research findings.   This doesn’t worry me – some things are obvious even early on in research and any final conclusions that the author reaches will be subject to the rigours of the academic system that surrounds such high awards.   The fact that JESIP doesn’t always work is a well documented fact. JESIP is a simple, indeed a worthy, statement of good intent.   The principles are, in one sense, not capable of being doubted.   Perhaps this is the reason that criticism is sometimes treated as heresy.   As a member of the publi...
Read more

Being a personal reflection on the importance of anniversaries

Image
  As anybody who reads my blogs knows, I think that that anniversaries are important.  One piece of feedback I received was to stop ‘banging on about them’.  I value feedback but I reject this suggestion because I have seen that recognising anniversaries can be a strong force for good.  This is true emotionally, but also practically.  They serve as landmarks in the temporal landscape.  They are an aide memoire of the lessons from major events and a benchmark to mark our progress or decline.  They also allow us to respectfully reflect on lives lost and loss endured.  Of course for those with personal connections with disasters anniversaries have a deeper and rawer significance. From a professional point of view we do well to remember the contributions of our forebears.  Their efforts are no less important than our own. Today my appointments took me through Moorgate station in the City of London and as always my thoughts turned to the horrors o...
Read more