More than one thing can happen at a time.................
All organisations need to be able to look beyond the current
crisis. Peering into the post pandemic
world is a necessity for public agencies and businesses. But there is no guarantee that we will get through
the current crisis without another coming to test our readiness at a time when the
national and international effort is aimed at the coronavirus.
This week has seen an earthquake in Croatia and an attempt to
derail a high speed passenger train in Germany.
Both incidents could have been worse and would have been had not a few variables
fell on the right side of incident/disaster divide. We also have our daily crises throughout the
world: hunger, homelessness and disease.
Add to this the fact that bad people will continue to do bad things even
when the country is uniting to confront a present danger. I was reminded of this a couple of days ago when
I saw that somebody in Northern Ireland thought that leaving a hoax device was
a good way of distracting the emergency services from their pandemic focus.
Terrorism provides a good model for this aspect of our response. When a terrorist attack occurs responders
deal with the scene and, hopefully, the suspects. Others, including parts of the police and
Security Service immediately turn their attention to the threat of further
attacks. In fact this two tier method of
viewing an incident works well across a range of threats and risk. I remember being asked by my boss during the
London bombing in 2005 to consider how we would respond to the next attack. His further demand that we write down what we
had learned from the day’s events so that we could do things better the
following day was the best piece of fast time reflection I have seen in the middle
of a crisis. When, 14 days later,
further attacks were inflicted on the capital we were much better prepared and
had a clear idea of what we needed to achieve (although, alas, I had nothing to
do with the improvement!).
In recent years we have had much talk about maintaining situational
awareness (although rarely does the use of the phrase include the full 3 stage
concept of Perception, Understanding and Projection (as described by Endsley,
1995). Developing and sharing SA is a
key point in the Joint Emergency Services Protocol (JESIP) which is as relevant
to the current situation as to any other.
However we hear less these days about the OODA Loop – a concept once
beloved by planners and command trainers.
However the basics of the OODA Loop: Observe, Orient, Decide and Act are
highly relevant in creating agile teams that can better respond to additional
incidents (Boyd, 1976).
What can be done to prepare for additional incidents? Staff will always do their best in
emergencies– we can almost take this for granted. But the public demand and deserve a
professional response. When things are
moving quickly and resources are hard to come by there are things we can do to
be ready for what might happen when ‘we least expect it’ (ie when we are least
ready for it and really don’t want it).
I list a couple of things in no particular order and commend the making
of a bespoke list relevant to your agency:
1.
Incorporate the concept of an additional event/s
into advance planning – particularly strategic planning. If nothing else ensure that plans contain a
prompt that other things can happen. When
exercising plans and people ‘left field’ injects are often seen as ‘unfair’ but
if properly crafted can help participants maintain an open mind.
2.
At the start of a protracted incident/crisis a
quick review of risk registers in the context of the ongoing event can bring a
pleasing clarity of thought. This only
works if risk assessments are meaningful in the first place. If not an hour spent with colleagues around a
(virtual) table conducting a ‘what if’ board blast will be time well spent.
3.
Consider how the extant crisis changes the
nature of internal risk. For example
many organisations have moved to remote working very quickly. What are the cyber security implications of
this for your agency? What are the
simple security implications (theft of kit, burglary etc).
4.
Think about planning conflicts. They are
inevitable in multiple or complex crises but they benefit from early
identification. Emergency planners can do this quickly if they are given space
to do it. As an example there are numerous plans written about the temporary
expansion of mortuary capacity in the UK.
But the requirements of a pandemic are largely about volume (body
holding). If an aeroplane falls from the
sky mortuary requirements are very different.
Can both be accommodated?
Whenever possible commitment to one course of action should allow for as
much flexibility as possible.
5.
Embed and share fast time learning from the main
event quickly – this allows for a workforce that is empowered and fleet of foot
enabling them to turn towards the next threat with nimble dexterity (well, less
clunkily anyway).
6.
Ask ‘what can bad people (state actors,
terrorists, criminals etc) do in the current crisis and how do we mitigate this’
(external focus)?
7.
Some teams benefit from starting each day/week by
confronting the question; ‘what if (insert additional incident) happens today’? This should not be an abstract question. The benefit of doing this on the day is that
the disposition of people and equipment is known as are the programmed demands
of the coming 24 hours. Sub questions
include; ‘who would go to the scene (if there is one), who will have command
etc.
8.
If an incident occurs that requires attendance
at a large scene (train crash, motorway pile up etc) it will be useful if you have
discussed with colleagues in advance how the scene can be managed in a way that
minimises the infection risk to responders, especially as the rescue phase
moves into securing the scene, victim recovery and evidence gathering. Again, a quick desk top scenario with a few
key players will pay dividends if such an incident occurs.
Nowhere in this ramble around an important issue have I
mentioned organisational resilience or business continuity. These concepts are the product of both
culture and process. Two things that are
hard to build in short order. But if your organisation has fully embraced these
concepts then there should be nothing here that comes as a surprise. However I have encountered few organisations
that are fully mature in this regard and therefore the message is simple: (a) think about what might ALSO happen, (b)
talk about it (c) develop or adapt existing plans relevant to the existing situation
(d) make some lists. As professionals
you are entitled to be shocked if more than one crisis occurs at a time. But you should not be that surprised.
Comments
Post a Comment